Archive for the ‘Technology’ Category

Gauri Nanda invents Clocky: MIT Media Lab’s Project helps the oversleeper

Tuesday, April 12th, 2005

No more ‘easily-locate-in-the-dark-and-tap’ activity on Snooze button of your morning alarm, unless you can find the clock from one of the several random places it can hide in your bedroom.
Put simply, Clocky is a robotic alarm clock, which rolls off the bedside and wheels away into a quiet corner.

Quoting the inventor, Gauri Nanda, “I’ve been known to hit the snooze bar for up to two hours or even accidentally turn it off and then wake up shocked”.
How about a pillow, which vibrates and bounces and roars until you wake up. Just another idea in the kitchen bag…

Public Beta of Packaged Software: 10 steps for a successful Beta Program

Tuesday, April 5th, 2005

Recently, in a discussion I came across with a ‘How to do a Public Beta of Packaged Software’ question. What came out was a list of 10 bullet points. Not that I am an expert on this topic or I have successfully ran public beta programs for million (or billion) dollar corporations — I just happened to participate in a few.
Here’s how a successful public Beta program should be run (not in any particular order of appearance):

  1. Public Bug Parade
  2. Moderated Discussion Forum
  3. Moderated Chat amongst Beta Participants
  4. Incentives to Bug submitters
  5. Build announcements
  6. Visible Change Log of Builds
  7. Easy Feedback form
  8. Incentive for Referrals
  9. A certificate or tchochke as a Thank You note to each Beta participant
  10. Beta Program should run from a community website (Sales/Marketing pitch is the last thing Beta-users are interested in)

Update: Gautham proposes the 11th step (The Microsoft way of running a successful Beta Program) — Release the code, make people pay, and then fix the bugs.
Next Part: More details

Bo Peabody’s Completed Exercise: Better to be Lucky than Smart

Monday, March 28th, 2005

Found the following on Page 90 of Guy Kawasaki’s book, Rules for Revolutionaries:
Exercise
———–
Write a an essay answering this question: Why is it better to be lucky than smart (assuming you’re smart enough to know when you’re lucky)?
———-
Amazingly, Bo Peabody’s book (excerpted here) is the completed essay (and the real-life exercise!).

Bill Gates Picture: Seemingly Unfamiliar Face

Wednesday, March 9th, 2005

msft_bg_key.jpg
[Alt + PrtSc’ed on Mar 09, 2005]

Lucky or Smart? Smart enough to recognize the luck!

Sunday, January 30th, 2005

Bo Peabody started Tripod.com, with his professor (who gave him a B- in his course!), and later sold it to Lycos for $58 million. Inc. magazine has an excerpt of his new book, Lucky or Smart? Secrets to an Entrepreneurial Life.
Most interesting byte, “Was I lucky? You bet your ass I was lucky. But I was also smart: smart enough to realize that I was getting lucky.”
The book has some interesting thoughts which are worth deep interpretation. For example, the first round of $3m funding was done by the venture capital firm NEA, where Peadbody admits that NEA liked the plan because it mentioned the word “Internet” several hundred times. And why did NEA agreed to look into his business plan; his professor’s wife’s brother’s college roommate knew someone who knew someone at NEA(well, it’s always like that).
He further says, “I’ve often kidded that 90 percent of Tripod’s value was in the amount of press we received in such a concentrated period of time. Sitting at a board meeting, lamenting our anemic revenue, I once joked to the board of directors that rather than actually running ads on the Tripod site, I’d sell potential advertising customers the opportunity that I might mention them in an article or wear their logo on my baseball cap. The board didn’t laugh. They asked me to look into whether or not this plan was possible. Had I actually begun to believe what was being said about me in the press, I would never have sold Tripod when I did. I would have reasoned, instead, that I was in fact a genius, and that I should take complete credit for the great things happening to my company. Never mind that Tripod had little revenue, no profits, and an unproven business model; we should take this horse public. Had we taken it public, we would most likely have failed, and everyone, including many unsuspecting individual investors, would have lost a lot of money.”

Epinions founders sue Benchmark, August et al.

Tuesday, January 25th, 2005

SiliconBeat reports.
Epinions.com was a high-flying startup with prominent backers like Benchmark, August, etc. I also remember listening to Nirav and Naval Ravikant at numerous occassions at TiE, SIPA, etc. The three co-founders (including RV Guha) left almost $18 million in stock options of @Home, Yahoo, and AOL to start epinions.com and took the company to funding stage in record 12 weeks from the idea (even before a single line of code was written!).
Found this on Google —
Everyone has an opinion, how do you get paid for it. Well, something to reflect upon.

The future of Wireless, VoIP and Computing

Monday, October 25th, 2004

Bob Cringley has an excellent article on the future of VoIP, personal PBXs, community PVRs, and WiFi access.
Excerpts:
1. “…There is no desktop PC in Andrew’s house. Instead, he runs a Linix thin client on a Sharp Zaurus SL-6000 Linux PDA. Somewhere around is a hefty Linux server running Asterisk Open source VoIP software PBX…”
2. “…The Zaurus equipped with a tri-mode comm. card is a WiFi phone through the PBX. Walking outside the house the phone automatically converts to the local mobile phone carrier. At office it’s back to WiFi on office VoIP PBX and also connects to the home PBX. At Starbucks, it’s WiFi phone…”
3. “…Andrew’s server runs MythTV an Open Source DVR application, storing more than 30,000 TV episodes, movies and MP3 files…”
Bob Cringley wrote this famous book long before the dot-com rush.

.NET and Then Again

Sunday, October 24th, 2004

Last week I got a chance to see (as part of my day job) back-to-back demos from two companies (1, 2). Both the companies are emerging startups and had excellent products and rich GUIs.
What was surprising to me in their architecture was a complete absence of J2EE. Reps. from both the companies talked positively about the .NET stack and its ease of use.
.NET recently completed 2 years since its introduction by MSFT. On the anniversary, BZ Media conducted a research — 46% of the developers said that they were planning to write new applications in Visual C#, up from 37% and second only to Java which still commands 54%.
Whither Java?

HP EOLs Utility Data Center

Thursday, October 7th, 2004

19,100 whitepapers, tonnes of news stories, analyst hypes have been replaced by obituaries.
An old adage is sometimes relevant — Necessity is the mother of invention.

Built to Flip

Wednesday, September 29th, 2004

In the yester years, companies were built to last — carried over from founder to son to his grandchildren and further with astute loyalty and sense of possession. Most of these companies were privately held, then as times changed they became public but the founders still held the reins.
Built to Last. Not a very popular idea any more. Business 2.0 brings back the topic of “Built to Flip” where serial entrepreneurs and first timers take the idea to the masses with a single goal in mind. They are able to find a niche and make a play on that. I remember reading a similar cover story in Fast Company magazine few years ago, when 12-18 months was the maximum runway for most investors/founders. An interesting quote from the Fast Company article — “Come back with an idea that you can do quickly and that you can take public or get acquired within 12 to 18 months”.
All you need is a niche idea, some determination and a sabbatical.